Philippians 3:4–8 · King James Version

Gain counted loss

Paul has more ground than anyone for confidence in the flesh: circumcised on the eighth day, an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews, a Pharisee, a zealous persecutor of the church, blameless in the law’s righteousness. All this he now counts loss, even dung, for the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus his Lord.

Jump to verse

5 verses · 16 glosses · All commentators

3:4

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

Commentary · 3 glosses

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh – To prevent any cavil about what he said as if he did magnify Christ, and forbear glorying in those external privileges they did so much bear themselves upon, out of envy to them, for what they had; he here argues upon supposition (as elsewhere to cut off occasion from Boasters, 2 Cor 11:12, 18, 21–⁠22) that if it were lawful, and would turn to any good account to confide in the flesh, he had the same ground the Impostors had, and might build up that in himself which he had destroyed in others, Gal 2:18.

on 3:4–8

The apostle here proposes himself for an example of trusting in Christ only, and not in his privileges as an Israelite. I. He shows what he had to boast of as a Jew and a Pharisee. Let none think that the apostle despised these things (as men commonly do) because he had them not himself to glory in. No, if he would have gloried and trusted in the flesh, he had as much cause to do so as any man: If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof to trust in the flesh, I more, Phil 3:4. He had as much to boast of as any Jew of them all.

if any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: … not but that he might be exceeded by some in some one particular or another; as for instance, he was not of the tribe of Levi: nor of Judah; he was neither of the house of Aaron, nor of David; neither of the priestly line, nor of the blood royal; but taking all together, there was not a man in whom so many reasons met, for boasting and confidence in the flesh, as in himself.

3:5

Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;

Commentary · 3 glosses

He begins with his birth Privilege, intimating that he was not proselyted, but Born within the pale of the Church, and dedicated to God under the seal of the Covenant at the day of God’s appointment, Gen 17:12. … as touching the law, a Pharisee – By Religion and stricter observation of the Law, according to the prescript most in vogue, of that Sect which for Learning, knowledge of the Scripture, and reputation for Holiness, was the most eminent, Acts 26:5, yea, and his Father was of this Order before him, Acts 23:6.

on 3:4–8

1. His birth-right privileges. He was not a proselyte, but a native Israelite: of the stock of Israel. And he was of the tribe of Benjamin, in which tribe the temple stood, and which adhered to Judah when all the other tribes revolted. Benjamin was the father’s darling, and this was a favourite tribe. A Hebrew of the Hebrews, an Israelite on both sides, by father and mother, and from one generation to another; none of his ancestors had matched with Gentiles. 2. He could boast of his relations to the church and the covenant, for he was circumcised the eighth day; he had the token of God’s covenant in his flesh, and was circumcised the very day which God had appointed. 3. For learning, he was a Pharisee, brought up at the feet of Gamaliel, an eminent doctor of the law: … He was a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee (Acts 23:6), and after the most strict sect of his religion lived a Pharisee, Acts 26:5.

[Of] the tribe of Benjamin; who was a genuine and legitimate son of Jacob, whom he had by his lawful and beloved wife Rachel. Of which tribe was the first king of Israel, whose name was Saul, 1 Sam 9:1, and which was the apostle’s first and Jewish name, and which perhaps was common in that tribe on that account. … An Hebrew of the Hebrews; not so called only because he could trace his pedigree from Abraham the Hebrew, or understood, and could speak the Hebrew language, which the Hellenistic Jews could not, or was an illustrious one among them, but because both his parents were Hebrews.

3:6

Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.

Commentary · 3 glosses

touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless – He rises higher yet in his personal Obedience; … but it seems in the external observation of those things which the Ceremonial or Moral Law did prescribe, he was in the eye of Man, of a blameless conversation, resembling Zachariah and Elizabeth, Luke 1:6. Men could not tax him, he had behaved himself so conscientiously, Acts 23:1, yet when he had his eyes opened, he found here was no such matter of confidence for him before God, 1 Sam 16:7; 1 Cor 4:4. This external performance he found when enlightened, was far short of internal and perfect obedience, Rom 7:7, and therefore he saw it necessary to change the ground and foundation of his confidence, all that he before rested on unto Christ alone, 1 Cor 3:11; 2 Cor 5:17, not seeking to receive honour from Men, but that from Christ only, John 5:44.

on 3:4–8

4. He had a blameless conversation: Touching the righteousness which is of the law, blameless: as far as the Pharisees’ exposition of the law went, and as to the mere letter of the law and outward observance of it, he could acquit himself from the breach of it and could not be accused by any. 5. He had been an active man for his religion. As he made a strict profession of it, under the title and character of a Pharisee, so he persecuted those whom he looked upon as enemies to it. Concerning zeal, persecuting the church. … All this was enough to have made a proud Jew confident, and was stock sufficient to set up with for his justification.

Concerning zeal, persecuting the church – The apostle was very zealous of the traditions of the elders, and for the law of God, and towards God also; though his zeal was not according to knowledge, but blind, ignorant, and furious; … Touching the righteousness which is in, the law, blameless. This he mentions last, as including the whole of his righteousness, civil, ceremonial, and moral; and which he fancied was so perfect, that whatever righteousness was in the law, or required by it, he had it, and to such a degree, that he was blameless before God and men.

3:7

But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.

Commentary · 4 glosses

were gain to me – Those things which while I was a Jew I accounted rare and singular prerogatives, I now make no reckoning of; but slight them as not only worthless, but some way prejudicial to my better calling.

were gain to me – How advantageous soever they had, in the judgment of others well himself, been reckoned to be, before he was effectually called. those I counted loss for Christ – Yet, since the scales fell off his eyes that he could discern the truth, he was so far from accounting them profitable, that indeed he accounted them prejudicial, so far from an advantage, that they were a damage to him, looking for Salvation by Christ alone, Matt 21:31; Rom 9:30. They were but as pebbles that hide the Pearl of price, Matt 13:44, as ciphers to this figure, that can make anything valuable; therefore by Paul preferred to all before.

on 3:4–8

II. The apostle tells us here how little account he made of these, in comparison of his interest in Christ and his expectations from him: But what things were gain to me those have I counted loss for Christ (Phil 3:7); that is, those things which he had counted gain while he was a Pharisee, and which he had before reckoned up, these he counted loss for Christ. “I should have reckoned myself an unspeakable loser of, to adhere to them, I had lost my interest in Jesus Christ.” He counted them loss; not only insufficient to enrich him, but what would certainly impoverish and ruin him, if he trusted to them, in opposition to Christ. Observe, The apostle did not persuade them to do anything but what he had himself did, to quit anything but what he had himself quitted, nor venture on any bottom but what he himself had ventured his immortal soul upon.

But what things were gain to me – As circumcision, and the observance of the ceremonial law, which he thought were necessary to salvation; … for the apostle’s meaning is, not only that these things were judged by him, while in an unconverted state, good in themselves, and in some respects useful, but that they were really gainful, and meritorious of happiness in another world. But being converted, he saw all those things in a different light, and had a different opinion of them: those I counted loss for Christ; circumcision he saw was now abolished, and was nothing, and that the circumcision of the heart was the main thing.

3:8

Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,

Commentary · 3 glosses

and do count them but dung … Those much conversant in Greek Authors do criticize largely upon the word, which is acknowledged on all hands to import things if not loathsome, yet vile, and contemptible, as Chaff, or &c. and so not absolutely but in their respect, did Paul account all things in comparison of Christ, even our good works proceeding from an heart sanctified but in part; he doth not mean of the substance, but quality of the trust or merit placed in them, not in themselves, but in regard of confidence in them, as to pardon and acceptance with God: not in point of sanctification, but justification, the Apostle is here speaking to.

on 3:4–8

Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, Phil 3:8. Here the apostle explains himself. 1. He tells us what it was that he was ambitious of and reached after: it was the knowledge of Christ Jesus his Lord, a believing experimental acquaintance with Christ as Lord; not a merely notional and speculative, but a practical and efficacious knowledge of him. … 2. He shows how he had quitted his privileges as a Jew and a Pharisee: Yea doubtless; his expression rises with a holy triumph and elevation, alla men oun ge kai. There are five particles in the original: But indeed even also do I count all things but loss. He had spoken before of those things, his Jewish privileges: here he speaks of all things, all worldly enjoyments and mere outward privileges whatsoever, things of a like kind or any other kind which could stand in competition with Christ for the throne in his heart, or pretend to merit and desert. … Nay, he not only counted them loss, but dung, skybala—offals thrown to dogs; they are not only less valuable than Christ, but in the highest degree contemptible, when they come in competition with him.

and do count them [but] dung; or dog’s meat; see Philippians 3:2; what is fit only to be cast to dogs, as the word signifies; and intends everything that is base, mean, and worthless; as the faeces of men, the dregs and lees of liquor, the falling of fruit, chaff, stubble, the dross of metals, dung, and what not: so he esteemed his carnal descent; his form and sect of religion, and zeal in it; his ceremonial and moral righteousness before and after conversion; … that I may win Christ; not get an interest in him, for this he had already, and he knew he had, and that he should never lose it; … or his sense is, that he might gain by Christ, or that Christ might be gain to him, as he found him to be, and as he is to every believer; who by parting with all for Christ, gains much by him, as a justifying righteousness, acceptance with God, peace, pardon, life, grace, and glory.

Sources & sigla

Excerpts keep their writers’ wording. ☞ marks the editor’s voice. A siglum opens its source at any point in the passage.

EA
English Annotations · 1645
The Westminster Assembly's committee of annotators, Annotations upon all the books of the Old and New Testament. First edition (London, 1645), EEBO-TCP A36467. Source text
P
Poole · 1685
Richard Adams, Matthew Poole's Annotations (Philippians and Colossians; Calamy, Account, 1713). Annotations upon the Holy Bible, vol. II (London, 1685), EEBO-TCP A55368. Source text
H
Henry (W. Harris) · 1710s
William Harris, Matthew Henry's Exposition of the Old and New Testament (vol. 6, completed after Henry's death). lyteword mhenry-complete Markdown (CC0). Source text
G
Gill · 1746–48
John Gill, An Exposition of the New Testament. Good Books Free digital edition, checked against scans. Source text

Scripture: King James Version (1769). About this text and its editorial conventions

The commentators, introduced

Texts public domain · notes © 2026. The King James Version and the four commentaries are in the public domain in the United States. The selection and arrangement of the excerpts, their light modernization, the passage summaries, the introductions, the editor’s notes and the footnotes are © 2026 Baptist Seminarian; all rights in the new material reserved.