Philippians 2:1–11 · King James Version

The mind of Christ

Paul appeals to the Philippians, by their comfort in Christ, to be of one mind and one love, to do nothing from rivalry or conceit, and to look to one another’s interests. He sets before them Christ, who, being in the form of God, took the form of a servant and was obedient to death on the cross, and whom God has exalted as Lord over all.

11 verses · 40 glosses · All commentators

2:1

If there be therefore any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any bowels and mercies,

Commentary · 4 glosses

ANy consolation – A most vehement exhortation to unity and Christian love, by way of Rhetorical adjuration; as if he should say, As ever you look to receive any comfort in Christ, or reap benefit by his love, and the communion between you and the Saints of God, fulfill my joy, by keeping the unity of the Spirit in the bond of love.

if any fellowship of the Spirit – If ye have any Communion with me in the Graces of the Spirit, and stand fast in one Spirit, 1:27, and would show that you do persevere in the same Spirit, 1 Cor 12:4, which acts in all the Members of the Mystical Body of Christ, that do in him their head partake of it. if any bowels and mercies – If ye are daily affected with any real Sympathy, and Commiseration towards me in my bonds for Christ, such inward affections as were moving in him towards them, Phil 1:8, with Luke 1:78; 2 Cor 7:15; Col 3:12, the latter word Emphatically expressing the sense of the Metaphor in the former.

on 2:1–11

The inducements to brotherly love are these:— (1.) “If there is any consolation in Christ. Have you experienced consolation in Christ? Evidence that experience by loving one another.” The sweetness we have found in the doctrine of Christ should sweeten our spirits. … (3.) “Fellowship of the Spirit. If there is such a thing as communion with God and Christ by the Spirit, such a thing as the communion of saints, by virtue of their being animated and actuated by one and the same Spirit, be you like-minded; for Christian love and like-mindedness will preserve to us our communion with God and with one another.” … How cogent are these arguments! One would think them enough to tame the most fierce, and mollify the hardest, heart.

If [there be] therefore any consolation in Christ – Or “exhortation”, as the word is sometimes rendered; … as all true, solid, strong, and everlasting consolation is only in Christ, and is founded on the greatness of his person, as God our Saviour, on the fulness of his grace, the efficacy of his blood, the perfection of his righteousness and sacrifice, and on the great salvation he is the author of.

2:2

Fulfil ye my joy, that ye be likeminded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind.

Commentary · 3 glosses

that ye be like minded – Which is when they believe and affect the same things agreeable to the mind of God, 3:15; Acts 4:32; Rom 12:16; 2 Cor 13:11. having the same love – Having the same mutual sincere Charity, Eph 4:2; Col 3:14. being of one accord – Being unanimous in their honest designs, John 17:22; 1 Pet 3:8. of one mind – Agreeing as to the main in the same Judgment and opinion to promote the interest of Christ, 1 Cor 1:10; Gal 5:7, 10.

on 2:1–11

I. The great gospel precept passed upon us; that is, to love one another. This is the law of Christ’s kingdom, the lesson of his school, the livery of his family. This he represents (Phil 2:2) by being like-minded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind. We are of a like mind when we have the same love. Christians should be one in affection, whether they can be one in apprehension or no. This is always in their power, and always their duty, and is the likeliest way to bring them nearer in judgment. … Being of one accord, and of one mind; not crossing and thwarting, or driving on separate interests, but unanimously agreeing in the great things of God and keeping the unity of the Spirit in other differences. … (5.) Another argument he insinuates is the comfort it would be to him: Fulfil you my joy. It is the joy of ministers to see people like-minded and living in love.

Fulfil ye my joy – but his joy was not yet full, there were some things which damped it; as the unbecoming walk and conversation of some, of whom he spoke with grief of heart, and tears in his eyes; and the inclination of others to listen to the false teachers, those of the concision, or circumcision; and the murmurings, disputings, and divisions of others among them, that were contentious and quarrelsome; wherefore to crown his joy, and fill it brimful, he signifies that their unity in affection, judgment, and practice, would do it, for so he explains it as follows.

2:3

Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.

Commentary · 3 glosses

but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves – But cherish and exercise true Christian modesty and meekness (which is of another kind than that the Heathen Philosophers did prescribe) in a due preference of each other, Matt 11:29; Rom 12:10; Eph 4:2; 5:21; 1 Pet 5:5, as the Apostle himself gave example. 1 Cor 15:8–⁠9. … so that however one Christian may excel with some singular endowments: yet he ought to think they were not bestowed upon him, that he should be puffed up, or value himself above what is meet upon that account before God, being he hath received them of God, 1 Cor 4:7, but judge himself for his own defectiveness and faultiness; which will afford himself matter of abasement and humility; when yet with respect to others, whose hearts he knows not, he in charity thinketh the best, 1 Cor 13:4–⁠5, and if in this case he should be mistaken, his modest apprehensions would be acceptable to God, (designing to approve that which he doth) and profitable to himself.

on 2:1–11

2. He proposes some means to promote it. (1.) Do nothing through strife and vain glory, Phil 2:3. There is no greater enemy to Christian love than pride and passion. If we do things in contradiction to our brethren, this is doing them through strife; if we do them through ostentation of ourselves, this is doing them through vain-glory: both are destructive of Christian love and kindle unchristian heats. … (2.) We must esteem others in lowliness of mind better than ourselves, be severe upon our own faults and charitable in our judgments of others, be quick in observing our own defects and infirmities, but ready to overlook and make favourable allowances for the defects of others. We must esteem the good which is in others above that which is in ourselves; for we best know our own unworthiness and imperfections.

[Let] nothing [be done] through strife – About words merely; otherwise they were to strive for the faith of the Gospel, the purity of Gospel ordinances, worship and discipline; but the apostle would not have them strive merely to carry a point determined on, without having any regard to reason and truth, or yielding to the infirmities of the weak; which is the case and conduct of contentious persons.

2:4

Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.

Commentary · 3 glosses

Look not every man – The Apostle useth a word, which doth properly signify to aim or look narrowly as to a mark we shoot at; and his meaning is, that we should not principally or only aim at our own honour, or profit: for otherwise a Christian ought to provide for his own household, 1 Tim 5:8.

on 2:1–11

(3.) We must interest ourselves in the concerns of others, not in a way of curiosity and censoriousness, or as busy-bodies in other men’s matters, but in Christian love and sympathy: Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others, Phil 2:4. A selfish spirit is destructive of Christian love. We must be concerned not only for our own credit, and ease, and safety, but for those of others also; and rejoice in the prosperity of others as truly as in our own. We must love our neighbour as ourselves, and make his case our own.

but every man also on the things of others; not on their worldly things, busying himself with other men’s matters, and which he has nothing to do with, but on the sentiments and reasons of others; which he should well weigh and consider, and if they outdo and overbalance his own, should yield unto them; he should take notice of the superior gifts of others, and own and acknowledge them; which is the way to submit to one another in the fear of God, and to promote truth, friendship, and love.

2:5

Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

Commentary · 4 glosses

Let this mind be in you … Be you so humble and charitably mind, and so respect the good of others, even with neglect of your own, as we see Christ our Saviour did.

Let – Most Translations do express the causal or rather illative Greek, Particle, which ours doth here omit as an expletive. However the Apostle doth urge them to the exercise of self denial, mutual love, and an hearty condescension to one another from the great example of Jesus Christ, 2 Cor 8:9.

on 2:1–11

II. Here is a gospel pattern proposed to our imitation, and that is the example of our Lord Jesus Christ: Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, Phil 2:5. Observe, Christians must be of Christ’s mind. We must bear a resemblance to his life, if we would have the benefit of his death. … If we were lowly-minded, we should be like-minded; and, if we were like Christ, we should be lowly-minded. We must walk in the same spirit and in the same steps with the Lord Jesus, who humbled himself to sufferings and death for us; not only to satisfy God’s justice, and pay the price of our redemption, but to set us an example, and that we might follow his steps.

The apostle proposes Christ as the great pattern and exemplar of humility; and instances in his assumption of human nature, and in his subjection to all that meanness, and death itself, even the death of the cross in it; and which he mentions with this view, to engage the saints to lowliness of mind, in imitation of him; to show forth the same temper and disposition of mind in their practice, which also was in Christ Jesus; or as the Syriac version, “think ye the same thing as Jesus Christ”; let the same condescending spirit and humble deportment appear in you as in him.

2:6

Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

Commentary · 4 glosses

in the form of God – Either in the nature and essence of God, being very God, as the ancient Fathers generally expound the word μορφὴ here used; or in the state, that is, glory and majesty of God, appearing no otherwise, neither to Angels, nor to men, then as God in Divine glory and majesty. not robbery – It was his right by nature (See John 5:18) to be equal with God, and therefore the challenging it, could be no usurpation of another’s right, or taking to himself, that which was not his own.

being – i. e. Subsisting in opposition to taking or assuming, v. 7, and therefore doth firmly prove Christ, pre-existing in another Nature, to his so doing, namely his actual existing of himself in the same essence and Glory, he had from Eternity with the Father, John 1:1–⁠2; 17:5; 2 Cor 8:9; Rev 1:4, 8, 11. in the form of God … For the Apostle here treats of Christ’s Condescension, proceeding from his actual existence, as the term wherein he is Co-eternal and Co-equal to God the Father, before he abated himself with respect unto us. … None can rationally imagine that God was an external figure, wherein Christ was subsisting. For subsistence implies some peculiarity relating to the substance of a certain thing, whence we may conclude the Son to be of the same, (not only of like) substance with the Father, considering what signantly follows. … He did not really forego (neither was it possible he should) anything of his Divine Glory, being the Son of God still, without any Robbery or Rapine, equal to his Father in Power and Glory, John 10:30; 1 John 5:7, 20.

on 2:1–11

1. Here are the two natures of Christ: his divine nature and his human nature. (1.) Here is his divine nature: Who being in the form of God (Phil 2:6), partaking of the divine nature, as the eternal and only begotten Son of God. … He thought it no robbery to be equal with God; did not think himself guilty of any invasion of what did not belong to him, or assuming another’s right. He said, I and my Father are one, John 10:30. … Some understand being in the form of God—en morphe Theou hyparchon, of his appearance in a divine majestic glory to the patriarchs, and the Jews, under the Old Testament, which was often called the glory, and the Shechinah. … And he thought it no robbery to be equal with God; he did not greedily catch at, nor covet and affect to appear in that glory; he laid aside the majesty of his former appearance while he was here on earth, which is supposed to be the sense of the peculiar expression, ouk harpagmon hegesato. Vid. Bishop Bull’s Def. cap. 2 sect. 4 et alibi, and Whitby in loc.1

Who being in the form of God – but this phrase, “the form of God”, is to be understood of the nature and essence of God, and describes Christ as he was from all eternity; just as the form of a servant signifies that he was really a servant, and the fashion of a man in which he was found means that he was truly and really man; so his being in the form of God intends that he was really and truly God; … and this divine form and equality, or true and proper deity, he did not obtain by force and rapine, by robbery and usurpation, as Satan attempted to do, and as Adam by his instigation also affected; … as for the sense which some put upon the words, that he did not “affect”, or “greedily catch” at deity; as the phrase will not admit of it, so it is not true in fact; … and besides, the apostle is speaking not of what he was, or did in his incarnate state, but of what he was and thought himself to be, before he became man; wherefore the above sense is to be preferred as the genuine one.

2:7

But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

Commentary · 4 glosses

of no reputation – Divested himself of his robes of majesty and glory, and brought himself as it were to nothing. Word for word, evacuated himself; laid aside for the time his divine Majesty; … form of a servant – Either the true nature of man, who is a servant to God; or the quality and condition of a servant, living in subjection, and receiving stripes for us. See Isaiah 53:2–⁠5.

made himself – i. e. Most wittingly emptied himself, or abated himself of the all fulness of glory he had equally with God the Father, that considering the disproportion betwixt the Creature and the Creator; he in the eyes of those, amongst whom he tabernacled, appeared to have nothing of reputation left him, Dan 9:26. … He by taking the form of a mean Man, might so obscure the dignity of his Person, as to the acknowledgement of him to be the Son of God, equal with his Father, that in vouching himself to be so, he might be accounted a Blasphemer, John 10:36, and during that appearance, not seem to be the most high; even as a King by laying aside the tokens of his Royalty, and putting on the habit of a Merchant, when all the while he ceaseth not to be King, or the highest in his own Dominions. … of no reputation, and took – Taking (in the Greek, without any copulative and before it) in opposition to being, or subsisting; he was in the Form of God, which he had before, and took this which he had not then, into the unity of his subsistence, by a personal union, Heb 2:16.

on 2:1–11

(2.) His human nature: He was made in the likeness of men, and found in fashion as a man. He was really and truly man, took part of our flesh and blood, appeared in the nature and habit of man. And he voluntarily assumed human nature; it was his own act, and by his own consent. We cannot say that our participation of the human nature is so. Herein he emptied himself, divested himself of the honours and glories of the upper world, and of his former appearance, to clothe himself with the rags of human nature. He was in all things like to us, Heb 2:17. 2. Here are his two estates, of humiliation and exaltation. (1.) His estate of humiliation. He not only took upon him the likeness and fashion of a man, but the form of a servant, that is, a man of mean estate. … He was brought up meanly, probably working with his supposed father at his trade. His whole life was a life of humiliation, meanness, poverty, and disgrace; he had nowhere to lay his head, lived upon alms, was a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief, did not appear with external pomp, or any marks of distinction from other men.

But made himself of no reputation – Or “nevertheless emptied himself”; not of that fulness of grace which was laid up in him from everlasting, for with this he appeared when he was made flesh, and dwelt among men; nor of the perfections of his divine nature, which were not in the least diminished by his assumption of human nature, for all the fulness of the Godhead dwelt in him bodily; though he took that which he had not before, he lost nothing of what he had; the glory of his divine nature was covered, and out of sight; … a strange and surprising difference this, that he who was “equal to God”, should be “like to [sinful] men!”

2:8

And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

Commentary · 4 glosses

fashion as a man … As a true man (not in show and appearance only) as John 1:14, We saw his glory as the glory of the only begotten Son of God. Where as is demonstrationis, non similitudinis.2 he humbled himself – In this verse there is a kind of gradation: for it is more to become obedient than to humble himself: more to yield unto death, than to become obedient: more to be crucified, than simply to die. For it was to submit himself to a most painful, ignominious and a cursed death, Gal 3:13.

he humbled himself – He doth not say he was humbled or depressed by the just Judgment of God, but of himself, voluntarily, on his own accord without any constraint. … Had he staid in his life for degrees of obedience, his condescension had been admirable, but that he should submit to a penal and painful death (taking in his burial, and abiding in a separate state till the third day) this is stupendous: aggravated by the shame. even the death of the cross – Of dying on the Cross, willingly and meekly yielding himself though a Son to that ignominious cursed death, Deut 21:23; Acts 5:30; Gal 3:10, 13; Heb 12:2, far more reproachful than by heading, hanging, or burning, out of unspeakable love, to bring us nigh unto God, Rom 5:19; Col 2:14; 1 Pet 2:24; 3:18.

on 2:1–11

But the lowest step of his humiliation was his dying the death of the cross. He became obedient to death, even the death of the cross. He not only suffered, but was actually and voluntarily obedient; he obeyed the law which he brought himself under as Mediator, and by which he was obliged to die. … There is an emphasis laid upon the manner of his dying, which had in it all the circumstances possible which are humbling: Even the death of the cross, a cursed, painful, and shameful death,—a death accursed by the law (Cursed is he that hangeth on a tree)—full of pain, the body nailed through the nervous parts (the hands and feet) and hanging with all its weight upon the cross,—and the death of a malefactor and a slave, not of a free-man,—exposed as a public spectacle. Such was the condescension of the blessed Jesus.

and became obedient unto death, or “until death”; for he was obedient from the cradle to the cross, to God, to men, to his earthly parents, and to magistrates; he was obedient to the ceremonial law, to circumcision, the passover, &c. to the moral law, to all the precepts of it, which he punctually fulfilled; and to the penalty of it, death, which he voluntarily and cheerfully bore, in the room and stead of his people: even the death of the cross; which was both painful and shameful; it was an accursed one, and showed that he bore the curse of the law, and was made a curse for us: this was a punishment usually inflicted on servants, and is called a servile punishment; and such was the form which he took, when he was found in fashion as a man.

2:9

Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:

Commentary · 4 glosses

Wherefore God – Because he humbled himself so low, God exalted him so highly, viz above the grave in his resurrection, above the earth in his ascension, above the heavens in placing him at his right hand.

Wherefore – Some take this particle illatively connoting the consequent of Christ’s Exaltation, upon his antecedent humiliation, as elsewhere, John 10:17; Acts 20:26; Heb 3:7; 2 Pet 1:10. The Apostle showing the sequel of his sufferings to be Glory according to that of Luke 24:26. … Others take the particle causally intimating Christ’s meriting his own exaltation and our Salvation, and his accepting of superexcellent Glory as a reward of his unparalleled obedience, though he might have challenged it, by virtue of the personal union, Heb 13:20, with 12:2, obedience superior to Angels, required a recompense superior to their Glory, and Christ might upon his exquisite obedience, demand his own mediatory Glory as being our Head, and that being the beginning and cause of ours. However whether the particle of order note that of consequence, or causality, or both, there is no need of controversy (because of the Communication of properties) sith the Person of Christ, as God-man was glorified. … Though as God, there was a manifestation, yet there was no intrinsecal addition of Glory. He did as Man receive the name, or glory he had from all Eternity as God.

on 2:1–11

(2.) His exaltation: Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him. His exaltation was the reward of his humiliation. Because he humbled himself, God exalted him; and he highly exalted him, hyperypsose, raised him to an exceeding height. He exalted his whole person, the human nature as well as the divine; for he is spoken of as being in the form of God as well as in the fashion of man. As it respects the divine nature, it could only be the recognizing of his rights, or the display and appearance of the glory he had with the Father before the world was (John 17:5), not any new acquisition of glory; and so the Father himself is said to be exalted. But the proper exaltation was of his human nature, which alone seems to be capable of it, though in conjunction with the divine. His exaltation here is made to consist in honour and power. In honour; so he had a name above every name, a title of dignity above all the creatures, men and angels.

the exaltation of Christ was not only a consequence of his obedience and death, and his humiliation merely the way to his glory; but his high and exalted estate were the reward of all this; … by which is meant, not any particular and peculiar name by which he is called; … much less is the name Jesus intended, which was given him by the angel before his conception and birth, and was a name common to men among the Jews; but it seems to design such fame and renown, honour, glory, and dignity, as were never given unto, and bestowed upon creatures; as his rising from the dead as a public person, his ascending on high in the manner he did, his session at the right hand of God, his investiture with all gifts, power, dominion, authority, and with the judgment of the world; and whatever name of greatness there is among men or angels, Christ has that which is superior to it.

2:10

That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;

Commentary · 4 glosses

at the name of Jesus – The Apostle in these words seemeth to have reference to Isaiah 45:23, and the meaning is, that all creatures should adore, and worship Christ, and yield him all obedience, either voluntarily, or by constraint, as to their Sovereign King, at whose very name they should fear and tremble. This is in part now performed in the Catholic Church dispersed through the whole world; but shall be perfectly accomplished at the dreadful day of Judgement, Rom 14:11.

That at – In the Old Translation by Bishops in Queen Elizabeth ‘s time,3 (and some say in the Manuscripts of this) it is in the Name. However in ours now, it is not appositively at the name Jesus. the name of Jesus – But constructively of Jesus, intimating, that the Power, Glory, and Majesty of him who hath that name, unto which every knee is bowed, is that name which is above every name; which would not hold true, if the name were took for the very word Jesus, (that as before) being common to others in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, yea, and English. … and things under the earth – Either the Dead, who are hid in the Earth, and shall be raised by the power of Christ, in, or upon them, Acts 24:15. Or Devils, and wicked Souls.

on 2:1–11

And in power: Every knee must bow to him. The whole creation must be in subjection to him: things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, the inhabitants of heaven and earth, the living and the dead. At the name of Jesus; not at the sound of the word, but the authority of Jesus; all should pay a solemn homage.

That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow – Which is to be understood, not of the outward act of bowing the knee upon hearing the name, and the syllables of the mere name Jesus pronounced; for in the bare name there can be nothing which can command such a peculiar respect; it was a name common with the Jews: … Moreover, the words ought not to be rendered at, but “in the name of Jesus”; that is, in and by reason of the power, authority, and dignity of Jesus, as exalted at God’s right hand, every creature is to be subject to him: … But inasmuch as this action is a token of reverence, worship; and subjection, it is used for those things themselves; and the sense is, that Christ is exalted as before described, that every creature may give him reverence, worship, and adoration, submit and be subject to him, as all do, and shall, either freely or forcedly.

2:11

And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Commentary · 3 glosses

should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord – Can confess, or express their adoration of Christ, Rev 7:9, 11–⁠12, either with delight, or by a forced subjection, Rev 6:16, and acknowledge that he is Lord, i. e. of glory, Rom 11:36; 1 Cor 2:8; 8:6, the Son of God, 2 Cor 4:5; Heb 1:2, 4, having only power to command the Soul, and Conscience, Jas 4:12, and to save, Heb 7:25, being Lord both of the dead, and of the living, Rom 14:9, to the glory of God the Father. – Some render in the glory of the Father. Either in that, the honour of Christ redoundeth to the honour of the Father, Prov 10:1, with John 5:23; Eph 1:6, or the Father doth most glorify the Son in his Exaltation, who had most glorified him in his Humiliation, John 12:28, with 17:5–⁠6.

on 2:1–11

And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord—every nation and language should publicly own the universal empire of the exalted Redeemer, and that all power in heaven and earth is given to him, Matt 28:18. Observe the vast extent of the kingdom of Christ; it reaches to heaven and earth, and to all the creatures in each, to angels as well as men, and to the dead as well as the living.—To the glory of God the Father. Observe, It is to the glory of God the Father to confess that Jesus Christ is Lord; for it is his will that all men should honour the Son as they honour the Father, John 5:23. Whatever respect is paid to Christ redounds to the honour of the Father.

And [that] every tongue should confess – Whether of angels or men, or of men of whatsoever nation. Confession is either true and hearty, as when the mouth and heart agree in confessing, and which is made only by true believers; or verbal only, or in mere outward form, and by force, as in hypocrites, wicked men, and devils themselves; … The Vulgate Latin version renders the words, “because the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father”: being in the form of God, of the same nature and essence with him, and equal to him; as he will appear to be at his second coming, for then he will come in the glory of his Father.

Notes

  1. “See Bishop Bull’s Defence, chapter 2, section 4, and elsewhere, and Whitby on the passage.” George Bull, Defensio Fidei Nicaenae (1685); Daniel Whitby, A Paraphrase and Commentary on the New Testament (1703).

    ↩
  2. “Of demonstration, not of likeness”: as asserts what he was, and does not compare.

    ↩
  3. The Bishops’ Bible (1568), the English version before the KJV.

    ↩

Sources & sigla

Excerpts keep their writers’ wording. ☞ marks the editor’s voice. A siglum opens its source at any point in the passage.

EA
English Annotations · 1645
The Westminster Assembly's committee of annotators, Annotations upon all the books of the Old and New Testament. First edition (London, 1645), EEBO-TCP A36467. Source text
P
Poole · 1685
Richard Adams, Matthew Poole's Annotations (Philippians and Colossians; Calamy, Account, 1713). Annotations upon the Holy Bible, vol. II (London, 1685), EEBO-TCP A55368. Source text
H
Henry (W. Harris) · 1710s
William Harris, Matthew Henry's Exposition of the Old and New Testament (vol. 6, completed after Henry's death). lyteword mhenry-complete Markdown (CC0). Source text
G
Gill · 1746–48
John Gill, An Exposition of the New Testament. Good Books Free digital edition, checked against scans. Source text

Scripture: King James Version (1769). About this text and its editorial conventions

The commentators, introduced

Texts public domain · notes © 2026. The King James Version and the four commentaries are in the public domain in the United States. The selection and arrangement of the excerpts, their light modernization, the passage summaries, the introductions, the editor’s notes and the footnotes are © 2026 Baptist Seminarian; all rights in the new material reserved.